Supernova Taxonomy
First published 1996 October 17;
last updated 2002 February 12 by
M. Montes.
A Supernovae Taxonomy Flow Chart
Description of the Flow Chart
The observational classes are in sharp-cornered boxes. Theoretical
interpretations (i.e. possible progenitors) are listed in the
boxes with rounded corners. Examples are listed underneath the
observational classes. It should be noted that SN 1987A had a fairly odd
behavior (for fairly well understood reasons) and is certainly
not a prototypical SN IIP. It was rather sub-luminous, and
while it may represent a certain population of sub-luminous SN II, we
will probably not detect too many members of this population precisely
because they are sub-luminous. SN 1987A may be better classified as an
SN IIpec.
A theoretical interpretation of observations has driven the
organization of this plot. At the left side, there is little or no
hydrogen present in the ejecta; as one moves right, there is increasing
evidence for hydrogen. SN IIP have a plateau in their post-maximum
light curve, while SN IIL do not (Barbon et al 1979). SN IIL and IIP
may differ in the amount of hydrogen present in their envelope
(see Popov 1993); they may also differ spectroscopically (Schlegel
1996). I am not familiar with the light curves (as opposed to spectra)
of SN IIn in general. In particular, the light curve of SN 1988Z is
several magnitudes brighter (slower decline) than either IIP or IIL
light curves at very late times (Stathakis & Sadler 1991; Aretxaga et
al. 1999).
Current Classification Scheme
The current classification scheme has these broad divisions: SN I show
no hydrogen lines in their early spectra; SN II do show hydrogen in
their early spectra. Subclasses determined by spectral evidence are
denoted by lower-case letters, Ia, Ib, Ic, IIb (Woosley et al. 1987;
Filippenko 1988), and IIn (Schlegel 1990) . Subclasses
determined by certain properties of the (usually) B or
V light curves are denoted by upper-case letters, such as
IIP and IIL (Barbon et al 1979; Doggett & Branch 1985). There is some
suggestion (Schlegel 1996) that there are particular spectroscopic
differences between SNe IIL and IIP; currently these SNe are most easily
identified by their light curves.
Host Galaxies
SN Ia have been observed to occur in all types of
galaxies. SNe Ib, Ic, and II have only been observed in various
spirals, barred spirals, and irregular galaxies. In a recent
paper, van den Bergh, Li, & Filippenko (2003) find that five SNe
of types SNe Ib/c and II observed in their sample occurred in
bright E or S0 galaxies, but please read their discussion
carefully. In any case, they find no more 3% of SNe Ib/c and II
occur in S/E0. Relevant graphs by other researchers are presented at
the
International Supernova Network.
Radio Emission
Radio emission has been observed for some supernovae in SN types Ib,
Ic, IIb, IIn, IIL, and now IIP. Radio emission is an indicator of the
presence of circumstellar medium (CSM). The SN IIpec 1987A was observed
in the radio, but it probably would not have been observed at the
distance of a few megaparsecs. Radio emission has not been observed
from SNe Ia, but certain models of SN Ia propose radio emission at some
level before maxima. The sole IIP observed near the time of its
explosion in the radio is SN 1999em (Lacey et al. 1999); additionally
the SN IIP 1923A has recently been detected in the radio (Eck et al.
1998). It is possible that SNe IIP are not usually observed in the radio
since their usually tenuous CSM imply much weaker radio emission than
we are able to detect with typical observations.
Distance estimates, observed B or V magnitudes, SN type,
and age since optical maximum are used to help decide whether or not (and
when) to observe SN in the radio. A few supernovae (SNe 1978K, 1981K,
1986J) have been serendipitously discovered in the radio before they were
subsequently observed at other wavelengths.
A list of supernovae that have been observed (both detections and
non-detections) in the radio may be found here.
X-Ray Emission
X-Ray emission is another indicator of the presence of reasonably dense
circumstellar medium, and has been observed for a small number of
supernovae at different ages. Many SN IIn (SNe 1988Z, 1995N, 1994W, ...),
some IIL (1980K, 1979C), all the recent nearby objects ( 1987A, 1993J, and
1994I), and a IIP (1999em) have been at least detected in x-rays. To my
knowledge, no SNe Ia have been detected in x-rays.
Frequently (but not always) radio detection is used to determine whether or
not to observe at x-ray wavelengths.
A list of supernovae detected in X-Rays may be found here.
Photometry
Poznanski et al. (2002) have proposed a classification method based on
photometry when spectroscopy is not available. The capabilities and
limitations of this method are described in their article (see the
references section below).
Supernova Progenitors
Supernova Types II, Ib, & Ic
All observations taken together imply that SNe II, Ib, and Ic arise from
stars that are young, and were initially very massive. These supernovae
are believed to form when their core collapses, that is, when nuclear
burning cannot produce any more energy. Spectra and numerical models of
SNe Ib & SNe Ic imply they have have lost much or all of their hydrogen
envelopes; SNe Ic may also have lost much of their helium envelopes (see,
for example, Nomoto et al. 1995; Nomoto et al. 1996; Filippenko 1997).
Models and spectra of SNe IIn seem to imply the shock and ejecta of the
supernova are interacting with a very dense circumstellar medium (see, for
example, Cumming & Lundqvist 1997; Filippenko 1997).
Type Ia Supernovae
SNe Ia are believed to arise from accretion
onto a white dwarf (a very old, dense, relatively low mass star that is not
undergoing thermonuclear reactions in its core), although the exact
population has yet to be identified. In this case, a detonation
(supersonic burning front) or a deflagration (subsonic burning front) [I
don't think the models are clear on this point yet] of the star occurs
when it has accreted enough matter (the exact amount depends on the
particular situation). Links to more detailed explanations may be
found in the tutorial
section of my Supernova and
Supernova Remnants pages.
What is NOT Included in the Taxonomy Chart
I have not included SN IIn or SN IIpec (peculiar) supernovae. I made
this chart awhile back, and cannot remember why I did not include them.
Perhaps they will be included in a later version of this chart.
SN IIpec was proposed by Doggett & Branch (1985) to be a catch-all for all
of Zwicky's SN III, SN IV, and SN V. I believe that the current class SN
IIpec contains those SN II that are not SN IIL, IIP, IIb, or IIn.
SN IIn were introduced in Schlegel (1990). Members of the class
typically have absent (or weak) H-alpha absorption, and narrow H-alpha
emission on a broad base. Several members of this class have been
observed in radio and X-Ray. Some recent ideas on the diversity of SN
IIn are presented in Cumming & Lundqvist (1997). Some supernova
classified as Zwicky's SN III, IV, and V were probably IIn. Some IIn
(SN 1986J, SN 1978K) have been called SN V in the past.
For the curious, SN 1961I was listed as an SN III; SN 1961F is the
prototype of Zwicky's SN IV; and SN 1961V was for quite some time the
sole member of Zwicky's SN V (Zwicky 1964). (For a more recent
discussion SN V, see Ball 1993.) SN V are a weird case, and many
believe that SN 1961V was actually the outburst of a Luminous Blue
Variable. For the latest on SN 1961V, see Stockdale et al (2001) and
Filippenko et al (1995). SN III and SN IV have been reclassified as
various SN IIpec (Doggett & Branch, 1985; Patat et al, 1993).
The Chart
This chart is also available as an EPS file at taxonomy.sne.ps.
This chart is also available as an EPS file at taxonomy.sne.ps.
Published References
These are more or less recent references. I hope I am not slighting
anyone by leaving out even other references. Please consult the
references of these references for more information.
- I.
Aretxaga, S. Benetti, R.J. Terlevich, A.C. Fabian, E. Cappellaro,
M. Turatto, and M. Della Valle 1999, Monthly Notices of
the Royal Astronomical Society, 309, 343 [SN IIn]
- L. Ball 1993, Proceedings of the Astronomical Society of
Australia, 10, 357 (Workshop Proceedings with abstracts by:
A.J. Turtle; E.M. Sadler; D. Allen; S.D. Ryder; L. Staveley-Smith; A.
Achterburg; M.A. Dopita; and L. Ball.) [SN V]
- R. Barbon, F. Ciatti, and L. Rosino 1979, Astronomy and
Astrophysics, 72, 287 [SN IIP, SN IIL]
- R.J.
Cumming and P. Lundqvist 1997, in Advances in Stellar
Evolution, ed. R.T. Rood (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press),
p. 297
e-print at
xxx.lanl.gov [SN IIn]
- J.B. Doggett and D. Branch 1985, Astronomical
Journal, 90, 230 [SNI, SNIIP, SNIIL, SNIII, SNIV, SNV, SNIIpec]
- C.R.
Eck, D.A. Roberts, J.J. Cowan, and D. Branch 1998, Astrophysical
Journal, 508, 664 [SN IIP]
- A.V.
Filippenko 1997, in Annual Reviews of Astronomy and
Astrophysics, 35, 309 [SN Ia,Ib,Ic,IIP,IIL,IIn]
- A.V. Filippenko 1996, in Thermonuclear Supernovae, ed. R.
Canal, P. Ruiz-Lapuente, and J. Isern (Dordrecht: Kluwer) [SN
Ia,Ib,Ic]
- A.V.
Filippenko, A.J. Barth, G.C. Bower, L.C. Ho, G.S. Stringfellow,
R.W. Goodrich and A.C. Porter 1995,
Astronomical Journal, 110, 2261 [SN1961V, SNV]
- A.V. Filippenko 1991, in Supernovae, ed. S.E. Woosley
(New York:Springer-Verlag), p. 467 [SN Ib/IIb]
- A.V. Filippenko 1988, Astronomical Journal,
96, 1941
- R.P. Harkness and J.C. Wheeler 1990, in Supernovae,
ed. A. Petschek, page 1
- C.K.
Lacey, R.A. Sramek, S.D. Van Dyk, and K.W. Weiler 1999,
International Astronomical Union Circular, 7318, 2 [SN
IIP]
- K. Nomoto, K. Iwamoto, T. Suzuki, O.R. Pols, H. Yamaoka,
M. Hashimoto, P. Hoflich, and E.P.J. Van Den Heuvel 1996, in
Compact Stars in Binaries, J. van Paradijs et al., (eds),
p. 119 [SN Ib,Ic,IIb,IIL]
- K. Nomoto, K. Iwamoto, and T. Suzuki 1995 Physics
Reports, 256, 173 [SN Ib,Ic,IIb,IIL]
- F.
Patat, R. Barbon, E. Capellaro, and M. Turatto 1993,
Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, 98, 443
[SN IIP,IIL]
- D.V.
Popov 1993, Astrophysical Journal, 414, 712 [SN
IIP,IIL]
- D. Poznanski,
A. Gal-Yam, D. Maoz, A.V. Filippenko, D.C. Leonard, and T. Matheson
2002, e-print at LANL [Photometric Classification of SNe]
- E.M.
Schlegel 1990, Monthly Notices of the Royal
Astronomical Society, 244, 269 [SN IIn]
- E.M.
Schlegel 1996, Astronomical Journal, 111, 1660.[SN
IIL]
- R.A. Stathakis and E.M. Sadler 1991, Monthly Notices of the
Royal Astronomical Society, 250, 786
- C.J. Stockdale, M.P. Rupen, J.J. Cowan, Y.-H. Chu, and S.S. Jones
2001, Astronomical Journal, 122, 283.[SN 1961V,SNV]
- S. van den Bergh,
W. Li, and A. V. Filippenko 2003 [SN types and host galaxy
morphology]
- S.E. Woosley, P.A. Pinto, P.G. Martin, and T.A. Weaver 1987,
Astrophysical Journal, 318, 664
- F.
Zwicky 1964, Astrophysical Journal, 139, 514. [SN
1961V, SNV]
- F. Zwicky 1965, in Stars and Stellar Systems, Vol. 8,
ed. by L.H. Aller and D.B. McLaughlin (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago
Press), p. 367
Other Online Resources
Last updated 2002 February 12.
M. Montes
montes@rsd.nrl.navy.mil